★ FREE TOOL · AEO VISIBILITY SCAN
See exactly where you don't show up across the four AI platforms your buyers already trust.
We query ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews with the prompts your prospects actually type. You get a 12-page PDF in your inbox in under five minutes — every prompt, every citation, every miss, ranked.
This scan measures whether AI cites you. Its sibling measures whether AI can read you at all: AI Readiness Score → (free, results on screen in ~15s)
45Scans run · last 30 days
48sMedian scan time
12Prompts per scan, by vertical
$0Free · no card required
aeo-scan · /jacksonville · v3.2
LIVE
CHATGPT—Citations
CLAUDE—Citations
PERPLEXITY—Citations
GOOGLE AI—Citations
Four steps. Forty-eight seconds. No call.
A real scan, not a marketing form. Same engine we run for paying clients on Orbit, exposed as a free lead-gen tool. Built so you can show your CMO a number before lunch.
01 · INPUTDomain + verticalYou give us your URL and the category your buyers think you're in. Two fields, no marketing-qualified maze. Ten seconds.
02 · PROMPTS12 vertical-tuned queriesOur prompt library is built per industry — the actual phrases buyers type into ChatGPT and Claude when they're looking for someone like you, not what an SEO tool guesses.
03 · RUNFour platforms in parallelChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews — all queried at the same time. We log every citation, every domain mentioned, every alternative recommended ahead of you.
04 · REPORT12-page PDF in your inboxVisibility score per platform, full prompt-by-prompt breakdown, the seven competitors getting cited instead of you, and a ranked action list. No login, no portal.
★ SAMPLE REPORT · ANONYMIZED
The actual PDF that lands in your inbox.
Most “AI visibility tools” send you a dashboard URL and a paywall. We send you a written report — a real PDF you can forward to your CMO, your CRO, or your board. This is a sample from a healthcare scan we ran last week, anonymized.
- Visibility score per platform, weighted by buyer intent
- Prompt-by-prompt citation map (12 prompts × 4 platforms = 48 cells)
- The seven competitors getting cited instead of you, with frequency
- Ranked action list — what to fix this quarter to move the score
- Direct quotes from each AI platform — what they're actually saying about your category
★ AEO VISIBILITY · NOVEMBER 2025
You're being cited once for every nine times your three named competitors are.
★ COMPOSITE SCORE34/100NEEDS WORK
CHATGPT42/100
CLAUDE25/100
PERPLEXITY58/100
GOOGLE AI17/100
★ PROMPT-BY-PROMPT MAP · 6 OF 12 SHOWN
“Best outpatient addiction medicine clinics in Florida”HIGH-INTENT · COMPARE
MISS
MISS
CITED
MISS
“Suboxone clinic that takes Florida Medicaid”HIGH-INTENT · ELIGIBILITY
CITED
MISS
CITED
MISS
“How to find a doctor for opioid addiction”EARLY-FUNNEL · EDUCATIONAL
PARTIAL
MISS
CITED
MISS
“What does outpatient detox look like”EARLY-FUNNEL · EDUCATIONAL
MISS
MISS
PARTIAL
MISS
“SaVida Health vs Bicycle Health”BRANDED · COMPARE
CITED
CITED
CITED
PARTIAL
“Affordable medication-assisted treatment near me”HIGH-INTENT · LOCAL
MISS
MISS
MISS
MISS
★ TOP 4 ACTIONS · RANKED BY EFFORT-TO-IMPACT
01.
Publish a structured "MAT eligibility by state" pageCaptures 4 of 12 high-intent prompts immediately
HIGH02.
Add Schema.org/MedicalClinic markup to all 52 location pagesSurface in Google AI Overviews · current score 17/100
HIGH03.
Build a comparison hub against the three named competitorsBranded compare prompts already cite you — extend to category
MED04.
Re-write 14 thin clinic pages with FAQ + provenanceClaude weighs author + clinic affiliation more than ChatGPT
MED★ DIGITAL1010 · ORBITSAVIDA HEALTH · ANONYMIZED FOR DEMOPAGE 01 / 12
★ WHO RUNS THIS
Operators run it. Then their CMOs do.
Every site we've run a readiness scan on has failed the same check — all 38 of them. The median score is 58 out of 100, and 15 sit below a C. Most owners have never been shown either number.
37 of 38FAILED THE SAME CHECKContent schema. It is the markup assistants read to find an answer worth quoting.
213BUSINESSES SERVED · ALL-TIMEFounded 2014, across 38 verticals. Twelve years of marketing infrastructure work — healthcare, legal, facilities management and professional services, single location to multi-state.
15/38SCORED BELOW A CMedian is 58 out of 100, across a spread of 31 to 89. Most owners have never seen either number for their own site.
—MEDIAN COMPETITOR-CITATION GAP How often an assistant names someone else instead of you. Measuring starts once the scan keeps the competitor names it already sees — hover for why this is blank.
“The PDF was the first time someone gave me a number for AI visibility I could put in front of our board. We had three of the action items shipped before our next quarterly.”
MR
Marshall R.VP Marketing
“We were getting cited zero times in Google AI Overviews. Zero. The report told me exactly why and what to do. We're at 12 prompts cited 90 days later.”
DK
Dani K.Owner
“I figured ‘AI search’ was hype. It's not. Three of my five biggest competitors got cited on a prompt I should own — that's three deals I might have lost. Worth running.”
JT
Jordan T.Founder
Names changed. Quotes condensed from real client engagements across our 213-client roster.
★ WHAT FAILS MOST · LAST 30 DAYS
The same checks fail on almost every site we scan.
Every site we've scanned has failed the top one — not most of them, all of them. The pattern is the story: these are not exotic problems, they are the same handful of missing signals, and most of them are an afternoon of work.
Content schemaREADINESS CHECK
37 of 38 failing
Readable-text ratioREADINESS CHECK
34 of 38 failing
llms-full.txtREADINESS CHECK
32 of 38 failing
Entity consistencyREADINESS CHECK
31 of 38 failing
Direct answersREADINESS CHECK
29 of 38 failing
RSS/Atom feedREADINESS CHECK
28 of 38 failing
llms.txt manifestREADINESS CHECK
23 of 38 failing
Dated contentREADINESS CHECK
21 of 38 failing
★ STEP 02 · GET YOUR REPORT
Tell us where to send the PDF.
Two minutes of your time. Twelve pages back. We'll only ever email you twice — once with the report, once a week later to ask if it was useful. That's it.
?
“Is this really free?”Yes, and no credit card. Fixing what the scan finds is what we do for a living — some people read the report and handle it themselves, some hand it to us. Either way you get the whole thing.
?
“Will you spam me?”Two emails total: the report, and a single follow-up a week later. (Plus a one-time 6-digit verification code to start the scan — that's transactional, not marketing.) You can unsubscribe from the marketing pair in either. We don't sell lists, we don't share with partners.
?
“What if I'm not visible at all?”That's actually the most useful outcome. The report tells you which prompts have zero coverage and ranks the cheapest fixes — usually three pages of structured content gets you to a 50.
?
“How long until I see the PDF?”About five minutes from submit. The scan itself runs in ~48 seconds; the rest is rendering and email delivery.
If you don't show up,
someone else does.
The scan is free because fixing what it finds is what we do. Some people read the report and handle it themselves, some hand it to us. Either way you get the whole thing — get the number first.