Where is yourwebsite weakest?
This point-in-time scan applies a published Digital1010 house rubric to four things: speed, functionality, entry-page design, and conversion elements. It shows the evidence, every measured failing check, and its fix. The score is not a validated business outcome.
Read every check, threshold, weight, scope, version, and shared grade band →
Largest Contentful Paint, layout stability, responsiveness, and first paint, pulled from Google's own API. Field data from real visitors supplies the points where it exists; otherwise the check is labelled as lab data.
JavaScript errors on load, sampled internal links, HTTPS and mixed content, real 404s, redirect chains. A broken script can affect forms, menus, and tracking; this check records only what the sampled load reports.
The part no other free tool attempts. A visual model grades your page against a fixed rubric: hierarchy, typography, whitespace, above-fold clarity, and dated-design markers. The rubric records those visual markers without claiming a business outcome.
Is there a visible action on the entry page, is the phone number tappable, is there any way to convert without hunting, and does the visible page prove you're real.
Every failed check carries a written fix. Every fix above is work we do. The list is yours either way, including if you hand it to your own developer.